Hybrid Process Model Creation and Evolution †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Hybrid Process Model Creation and Evolution. Answer: Introduction: The article under review in this essay is titled Case Analytics Workbench: Platform for Hybrid Process Model Creation and Evolution. This article was presented by Yu, X; Li, X; Liu, H; Mei, J; Mukhi, N; Ishakian, V; Xie, G; Lakshmanan, G.T. and Marin, M. during the 13th International Conference on Business Process Management. The article discusses a new approach of creating and developing an effective hybrid process model that combines both declarative and imperative business modeling processes. The importance of business process modeling in business process management cannot be overemphasized. For a business to thrive in a competitive environment, it must have properly structured models that make it easier to execute, analyze and improve various processes of the business. This review will be discussed by describing the content and intension of the article, analyzing the discussion and conclusions made by the authors, identifying issues highlighted by the authors about the model deve loped, discussing the relevance of the model created in business process management and writing a conclusion of the entire article. This article discusses a new approach of creating and developing hybrid process models called Case Analytics Workbench. According to the authors of the article, this is an end-to-end system that accelerates the process of creating and developing hybrid process models through combination of imperative and declarative process mining, human interaction through a cloud environment and event log clustering. Most of business modeling processes have been either imperative or declarative. Imperative modeling processes include XPDL (XML process definition language), BPMN (business process model and notation and web services BPEL (business process execution language). These processes apply imperative paradigm where only allowed activity flows are captured and any unspecified flow is rejected implicitly thus limiting many BPM applications(De Giacomo, et al., 2015). Declarative modeling processes include SCIFF, Declare and DCR. These processes allow all activity flows as long as specified constr aints are not violated(Goedertier, et al., 2015). But as a result of changing business environments, customer demands, economic factors and technologies, many businesses nowadays have knowledge-intensive processes that cannot be efficiently met with either declarative or imperative modeling process. The knowledge-intensive processes largely depend on knowledge and expertise of workers who perform different interrelated knowledge-intensive executive tasks that are centered on large volumes of data and information and need greater flexibility. Both the imperative and declarative modeling process have their own strengths and weaknesses using each of these processes individually is not enough to meet the current business process modeling requirements(Caron Vanthienen, 2016). To overcome this challenge, authors of this article decided to develop an approach that combines both the declarative and imperative business modeling processes. Hybrid models improve service quality of clients off ered by BPM companies, consultants or specialists(Parody, et al., 2016); (Wang, et al., 2013). Therefore the purpose of this article is to examine a new approach of creating and developing an effective hybrid process model called case analytics workbench, which combines both declarative and imperative business modeling approaches. The hybrid modeling approach is able to modeling all processes of the business. Looking at it from human effort perspective, creating and refining a hybrid business process model for knowledge-intensive processes is a demanding task. To begin with, the modeler must visualize the process model so as to have a picture of the final product. This gets more challenging as the complexity and structure of the business becomes more complex. Second, the model should identify and follow an appropriate learning curve so as to learn the latest hybrid modeling guidelines and languages. Third, the modeler must ensure that his hybrid model is up-to-date by running various process mining approaches and explaining the results comprehensively so as to improve it. Last but not least, it is important for the modeler to check other analytics approaches so as to customize his model even better. There are five main features that make case analytics workbench a better business process modeling method. First, this method combines mining results obtained from both imperative and declarative processes and extract evidences backed by data then uses an original hybrid model to synthetize the evidences automatically. Second, it applies a hybrid modeling approach that is acceptable in the industry by modeling declarative parts and imperative parts using CMMN and BPMN respectively, and considering their extendibility and applicability. Third, it uses event log clustering for customizing the business process model created. Fourth, it provides better and state-of-the-art interfaces that improves users visualization and interactions when creating and developing a business process model. Fifth, it is integrated with IMB Case Manager (IBM) a case management product(Yu, et al., 2015). The case analytics workbench comprises of four main modules: case model management module, data management module, process mining module, and evidence management module, as shown in Figure 1 below. Case model management module is the most fundamental module and it comprises of three components: case model storage, case model manager and case model editor. This module provides users with a platform for interacting with a case model and allow them to create, edit, save and transform business models(Yu, et al., 2015). Data management module handles different process execution logs or records, convert them to approved event record formats or layouts, and process them further with clustering. Process mining module uses data management modules event logs to run imperative and declarative process mining methods. Evidence management module obtains mining results from process mining module and presents it to the user for value-added understanding and insight. This model is also used to store, visualize, filter and synthesize evidences. In terms of organization, the workbench is divided into two segments. The first is the server-side components that are set out in the cloud, and the second is the client-side components that acts as an interface for users to execute their actions and also maintains business logic. To demonstrate the capability of case analytics workbench on creating and developing a business process model that has been created in this article, the authors performed two practical case studies, one from insurance industry and another from healthcare industry. The first case study was used to show how different components of the case analytics workbench are arranged and synchronized to help the modeler create and develop an underwriting model more conveniently. The second case study was about improving a complex hybrid model. In the first case study, 4300 execution logs of underwriting process were collected from an insurance company. Data presentation component of the workbench was used to transform the data to formal event logs. Event log cluttering was used to generate two clusters: cluster 0 with 2038 auto insurance underwriting cases and cluster 1 with 2267 property insurance underwriting cases. Declarative process mining method was used to generate visualization results in a Dendrogram. The results were presented in bars with different colors, lengths, black line position (showing support and goal correlation), as shown in Figure 2 below. The results provided very meaningful and reasonable elements that were not well-defined in raw data, such as additional tasks and constraints. Imperative process-mining method is also used to mine sensible sub-processes for various tasks then transformed them to evidences, as shown in Figure 3 below, which also contains evidences transformed from results of declarative process-mining method. Before evidence synthesis engine was automatically run, a filter was used to select strong evidences with support and goal correlation greater than 0.3 and 0.5 respectively. Recommendations for model improvement were provided by evidence synthesizer component, after which the user selected and confirmed the improvements in order to create the final process model, which is shown in Figure 4 below. Therefore this case study demonstrated data collection, preparation and clustering; process mining; and evidence analysis and synthesis processes of case analytics workbench. The second case study was used to show care pathway improvement. In medical context, a care pathway refers to a standardized process comprising of several care stages that correspond to various conditions of disease progression, and each stage has its different clinical tasks and unique constraints. Care pathways are usually complex and therefore the authors of this article were optimistic that a hybrid process model would be an effective solution to the problem. In this case study, the workbench was used to build a case model of initial care pathway derived from clinical guide for managing cognitive heart failure. The authors used real electronic medical records to mine evidences that were then used to refine the created model so as to generate one that met the needs of a specific group of patients. The evidences obtained from the imperative and declarative process-mining engines were meaningful and played a key role in refining the care pathway model, which is shown in Figure 5 bel ow. The case analytics workbench demonstrated in this article by its authors is evidently an efficient, flexible and reliable method of creating and developing a business process model. Nevertheless, the authors have highlighted some issues that must be considered to make the process successful or even better. One of these issues is the human effort needed when creating a business process model using the workbench. This process is knowledge intensive and requires the modeler to visualize the entire process and final product at the start, learn the latest hybrid modeling guidelines and languages any time they are released, continuously update the model being created and find out what other modelers are creating so as to improve and customize his model. Another issue is the cost of decoupling. If the volume of data being used is too large, it becomes relatively burdensome for the network to transmit the data between different modules of the model. Therefore advanced methods of data transmi ssion are necessary. The authors have also highlighted the need for empirical evaluation aimed at enabling different modelers create a hybrid process model integrally. This will enable the methods developed to run models that have already been generated instead of just being used as modeling tools. The case studies presented in this article have demonstrated the capability of case analytics workbench to create a hybrid business process model. This approach is cloud-based and has coherent interface that enables users to interact with case models and check analysis results absolutely hassle-free. This cloud-based architecture has numerous advantages including extendibility and versatility. In this article, it has been proven to be very useful and efficient for use in healthcare and insurance industries. The fact that hybrid process model combines declarative and imperative process-mining approaches makes it better than discrete models such as BPMN model. The hybrid process model created in this article is applicable in a wide range of fields of BPM and it has been accepted by BPM product developers and managers, BPM specialists, business process administrators, clinical physicians, etc. The key advantages highlighted by its users include: combination of imperative and declarative process-mining methods; involvement of clustering technique; and improvement of user interaction. Still there is room for improving the hybrid process modelling and more focus should be put on empirical evaluation so that different modelers can create a hybrid model integrally and use it to run already generated models. The authors of this article have comprehensively presented a solution of creating a cloud-based, end-to-end system that combines imperative and declarative process mining to create a hybrid business process model. Case analytics workbench, as it has been called, is an advanced, flexible, user friendly and versatile hybrid business process model that is can be used to solve a variety of business process management problems. The authors have successfully demonstrated application of this model in healthcare and insurance industries. Even though this hybrid model has numerous advantages over other models that use either imperative or declarative process-mining methods, there is still great room for improvement. Some of the suggested researches include: further empirical evaluation aimed at enabling different modelers to create a hybrid process model integrally; improvement of data transmission mechanisms; and reduction of decoupling cost. All in all, results obtained using the case analy tic workbench developed and presented by authors of this article were impressive and accepted by various specialists, including BPM specialists, business process administrators, BPM product developers and managers and clinical physicians. Therefore hybrid business process models such as case analytics benchmark have great potential of improving business process management. References Caron, F. Vanthienen, J., 2016. Exploring business process modelling paradigms and design-time to run-time transitions. Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 10(7), pp. 790-813. De Giacomo, G., Dumas, M., Maggi, F. Montali, M., 2015. Declarative Process Modeling in BPMN. In: Z. J, K. M J. P, eds. Advanced Information Systems Engineering . Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 84-100. Goedertier, S., Vanthienen, J. F, C., 2015. Declarative business process modelling: principles and modelling languages. Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 9(2), pp. 161-185. Parody, L., Gomez-Lopez, M. Gasca, R., 2016. Hybrid business process modeling for the optimization of outcome data. Journal of Information and Software Technology, 70(C), pp. 140-154. Wang, Y., Huang, L. Guo, Y., 2013. Intgrating declarative and imperative approach to model logistics service processes. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 6(1), pp. 237-248. Yu, X. et al., 2015. Case Analytics Workbench: Platform for Hybrid Process Model Creation and Evolution. Innsbruck, Austria, 13th International Conference on Business Process Management.